![]() It was through his works that he offered the principle later termed ‘Occam’s Razor’, arguing for explanations that require the least number of hypotheses. In logic, he penned down the ‘Sum of Logic’, a work in which he proposed the use of new concepts in logic as well as a new logical system. He actively advocated a nominalist philosophy, putting the individual at the center of all experience and regarding all universals as mere mental concepts. Ockham firmly believed that faith and private revelation were crucial for an individual to be able to reach the truth. William died in 1347 and his ex-communication was lifted by Pope Innocent VI in 1359. The dispute with the Papacy also led him to put more trust in the temporal monarchs, arguing in his subsequent treatises that the emperor should have full control over the church and the state in the Holy Roman Empire.įollowing his flight from Avignon, William had been excommunicated. While living in exile from the Papacy, William defended his views in writing and criticised the views of John XXII as heretical. As a result, William fled the proceedings of the papal court in Avignon in 1328 and sought refuge in the court of Louis IV of Bavaria, Holy Roman Emperor at the time. La navaja de Ockham, también llamada principio de parsimonia o principio de economía, es un postulado considerado una metodología. Since Franciscans, including William, avidly believed in apostolic poverty while Pope John XXII at the time disapproved of it, the issue put the leading Franciscans at odds with the Papacy. He then had to appear before a papal court to defend the commentary.Ī more troublesome conflict with Church authorities came in 1327 when William was once again summoned to a papal court and was embroiled in a debate about apostolic poverty. However, his commentary didn’t find approval with the Church authorities and was deemed unorthodox. Disputes with the Church and PapacyĪround 1324, William penned down a commentary on the ‘Sentences’ of Peter Lombard. CONTENIDOS PROCEDIMENTALES: Anlisis de los rasgos distintivos y representativos del pensamiento de Ockham a partir de la experiencia sinttica y estructurada de su filosofa. ![]() OBJETIVOS ESPECFICOS ACTITUDINALES: Analizar e interrelacionar las aportaciones del pensamiento de Ockham. ![]() This means that although he became a teacher at the university, his title continued to be that of a student. Aproximarse al pensamiento poltico de Guillermo de Ockham. He further studied theology at the University of Oxford where he continued to study until 1321.Īlthough he completed all prerequisites of a master’s degree at the university, he was given the title of an Inceptor rather than a Regent Master. It was as a part of the Order that he was able to have access to a vast body of literature, both philosophical and theological. Ockham Wittgenstein signs state of affairs habits propositions.William of Ockham was born in 1285 and he became a part of the Franciscan order of friars are a very young age. By analyzing certain a priori propositions, we recognize the very boundaries of the thought-language relationship, wherein the existential problems of mankind are revealed, whether out of the human tendency of explaining the world as a whole or out of the human attitude in the face of it. These propositions are established by the thought considered as “activity” and “operation of signs”. This construct is developed on the basis of the following three aspects: first, concepts are signs of things second, propositions describe “state of affairs” and third, knowledge in terms of “habits” is expressed in propositions structured in terms of the “uses” of language. Both authors uphold the conception of the world from a logical-philosophical dimension configured by the close thought-language relationship. moral: la formacin del pensamiento econmico europeo de la Escolstica espaola. 2018, n.12, pp.69-93.įor Ockham and Wittgenstein the analysis of knowledge is based on language. Scholastic Business Ethics: Thomas Aquinas Versus William of Ockham. On the Scope and Boundaries of the Thought-Language Relationship.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |